Stabilisers

Retrofitting yacht stabilisers: fins, gyros and planning

Compare fin and gyro retrofit requirements, including structure, space, electrical supply, cooling, weight, haul-out scope and sea trials.

By Blueward Marine6 min read
BLUE INFINITY ONE cruising at speed on the ocean with a rocky coastline in the background.
Photo: BLUE INFINITY ONE, Sunseeker Signature 95. Bluebnc Yachting managed fleet.

A stabiliser retrofit is not simply a matter of selecting a unit that fits an empty machinery-space footprint. The yacht's displacement, stability data, structure, electrical capacity, cooling-water route, service access and response to added weight all affect whether the proposal is workable.

This guide explains the documented requirements for gyro and electric-fin retrofits, including at-anchor claims, hull work, haul-out planning and commissioning. The available evidence does not define interceptor retrofit requirements, so any interceptor proposal needs separate manufacturer-specific performance and installation data before it can be compared properly.

Comparing the available stabiliser options

Performance claims must remain tied to the particular manufacturer and system. A claim made for one electric-fin product should not be transferred to another fin system, gyro or interceptor.

SystemDocumented performance basisMain retrofit workEvidence limit
Seakeeper gyroFormal prediction, followed by commissioning sea trialStructure, weight, power, cooling and accessNo explicit at-anchor claim in these facts
CMC Waveless STAB finsRoll reduction underway and at anchorYacht-specific power, structure, actuators and controlsClaim applies to this electric-fin range
CMC Stabilis Electra finsElectric concept avoids a complex hydraulic installationElectrical supply and fin-actuator engineering remainSimpler hydraulic scope does not remove engineering work
InterceptorsNot established by the supplied evidenceObtain system-specific design and performance dataNo supported comparison can be made here

CMC describes Waveless STAB electric fins as reducing roll both underway and at anchor. Its Stabilis Electra literature says the electric-fin refit concept removes the need to install a complex hydraulic system, but the yacht still needs a designed electrical supply, structural arrangement, actuator installation and control integration.

For gyros, the evidence supports a more measured approach: calculate predicted performance from the yacht's data, assess the installation, then verify the result during commissioning. Advertised roll reduction or the presence of unused space is not enough to approve a retrofit.

Start with sizing and yacht data

A Seakeeper proposal begins with a formal sizing and performance assessment. Its refit checklist requires waterline length, waterline beam, full-load displacement and GMt, if known, for the performance prediction report.

Accuracy matters because this assessment establishes the basis for model selection and expected performance. Before requesting a proposal, assemble:

  • Principal data: Record accurate LWL, BWL and full-load displacement, rather than relying on an incomplete machinery list.
  • Stability information: Include GMt when it is known.
  • Electrical information: Provide the existing generator data or the battery-bank, alternator and charger details relevant to the proposed model.
  • Machinery-space information: Survey access, structure, existing services and the intended installation area.
  • Modification history: Photograph former changes around stringers, bulkheads, hull structure and services.

This information should feed into the engineering proposal before equipment is ordered. Where the project also affects machinery arrangements, yard work or several technical trades, a defined yacht refit management scope helps keep structural, electrical and installation decisions within the same plan.

Survey structure, space and haul-out work

Before fitting a gyro, survey the hull, stringers, bulkheads and proposed installation area. Give particular attention to previous modifications, because the current arrangement must be understood before the new loads and foundations are designed.

Location is not only a question of footprint. Seakeeper advises positioning its gyro aft of amidships to minimise vertical accelerations while underway, but that guidance remains subject to the yacht's complete structural and weight assessment. The selected space must also retain the manufacturer's minimum service clearances and practical access for routine maintenance and overhaul.

Do not alter watertight structure as a convenient way to create access or installation space. Seakeeper directs installers to consult a naval architect if watertight structure must be modified.

A fin proposal brings a different set of hull-work decisions. Hull penetrations, structural reinforcement, fin and actuator selection, and control integration all require engineering input. These requirements should define the haul-out work before a yard period is booked, rather than being resolved after opening the hull.

The supplied evidence does not set a haul-out duration or a standard structural arrangement. Both depend on the yacht-specific design and the selected system, so they should appear explicitly in the approved retrofit scope.

Check power, cooling and added weight

Electrical capacity must be established against the selected equipment. For AC Seakeeper models 5 and larger, the refit checklist calls for confirmation that the existing generator can support the gyro's power demand. If capacity is uncertain, include a proper generator assessment within the retrofit plan rather than treating connection as a final installation task. Blueward Marine's marine generator service covers generator work associated with yacht systems.

DC Seakeeper 1, 2 and 3 proposals require a different review. Assess available battery space, battery-bank strategy, engine alternator output and charger rating against gyro spool-up demand. Crew can collect the ratings and arrangement information, but uncertain or inadequate capacity requires an engineer.

Cooling-water planning is also part of feasibility. Each Seakeeper should have a dedicated seawater pump and intake, so survey the distance and route between the proposed gyro location, pump and intake. Preserve service clearances while mapping that plumbing.

Added weight needs its own study before installation. Seakeeper recommends placing simulated unit weight at the proposed location and carrying out a brief sea trial. Record the resulting list, trim, planing and handling observations rather than relying on a static visual check.

Excessive stern trim can delay or prevent planing. It can also submerge engine-exhaust outlets, increasing exhaust back pressure, and reduce transom freeboard when reversing. These consequences are why the weight trial and location decision must be resolved before permanent installation.

After the Seakeeper refit, commissioning includes a sea trial using the Sea Trial App to confirm that performance meets expectations. That verification should be treated as part of the installation, not an optional test after handover.

What crew can check safely

Crew can improve the quality of the proposal without making structural changes or attempting installation work. The useful checks are documentary, visual and observational:

  • Assemble yacht data: Gather accurate LWL, BWL, full-load displacement and GMt if known.
  • Record electrical capacity: Photograph generator data and compile the battery, alternator and charger information requested for the proposed gyro.
  • Survey access: Measure and photograph the route into the candidate machinery space, including existing equipment and services.
  • Map structure: Identify visible watertight bulkheads, stringers and hull structure. Record former modifications, but do not alter watertight boundaries.
  • Plan gyro plumbing: Mark the proposed dedicated seawater pump and intake route while preserving the manufacturer's service clearances.
  • Document the weight trial: Log the simulated weight position and the resulting list, trim, planing and handling observations.

These records can be uploaded with a technical service booking, allowing the initial review to focus on missing data and engineering decisions rather than repeating the basic survey.

When to call an engineer

Bring in an engineer when the proposal moves beyond data gathering and visual inspection. The following conditions need formal assessment:

  • Structural involvement: The retrofit affects stringers, bulkheads, watertight boundaries or hull structure, or produces meaningful list or trim changes. Involve a naval architect where indicated.
  • Uncertain services: Generator capacity, DC battery, alternator or charger capacity, or cooling-water plumbing is inadequate or unclear.
  • Fin installation work: The proposal requires hull penetrations, reinforcement, actuator or fin selection, or control integration.
  • Compliance implications: The scope could amount to a major craft conversion under the EU Recreational Craft Directive. Directive 2013/53/EU brings watercraft subject to a major craft conversion within its scope, and the person putting the craft into service after major conversion must use the Article 23 procedure. Obtain flag, notified-body and classification advice as applicable before work through appropriate compliance and flag-state support.

Blueward Marine provides yacht stabiliser services and refit support from Palma de Mallorca. Submit the yacht data, fault or proposal details and photographs through online booking, or call the 24/7 emergency line on +34 971 251 374.

Prefer a call back?

Leave your name and number and we'll call you back. Add the yacht's name if you have it.

We call back Mon–Fri 8:00–18:00 and Sat 9:00–15:00. For an emergency, phone +34 971 251 374.

Frequently asked questions

What must be checked before fitting a Seakeeper to a yacht?

Start with accurate LWL, BWL, full-load displacement and GMt if known. Survey the hull structure, previous modifications, installation access and service clearances. The proposal must also assess generator or DC-system capacity, dedicated seawater pump and intake routing, added weight, trim and handling. Commissioning then includes a sea trial using the Sea Trial App.

Can a gyro retrofit change yacht trim and planing performance?

Yes. Seakeeper recommends simulating the proposed unit weight at its intended location and conducting a brief sea trial. Excess stern trim can delay or prevent planing, submerge engine-exhaust outlets and reduce transom freeboard when reversing. Record list, trim, planing and handling during the weight trial before approving the permanent location.

Do electric fins work at anchor and simplify a retrofit?

CMC states that its Waveless STAB electric fins reduce roll underway and at anchor. Its Stabilis Electra concept avoids installing a complex hydraulic system, but that does not remove the need for yacht-specific structural design, electrical supply assessment, hull penetrations, fin-actuator installation and control integration. Do not apply these claims automatically to other fin systems.

Sources and further reading

These references informed this guide. Follow the procedures and limits for the equipment installed on board.

Back to Blog

Something not working on board?

Book online in two minutes: describe the fault, add photos and our AI technician gathers the details an engineer needs. Or call us, we answer 24/7 for emergencies.